Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates RRI-guided MAP titration for mortality outcomes in sepsis patients, suggesting improvements in renal function without mortality reduction.
In sepsis, optimizing mean arterial pressure (MAP) for organ perfusion remains challenging. We conduct a single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolling 274 sepsis patients to evaluate whether renal resistive index (RRI)-guided MAP titration (MAP titration group, MTG) reduces 28-day all-cause mortality (primary endpoint) compared with conventional treatment (conventional treatment group, CTG). Post-titration, RRI decreases significantly in the MTG versus CTG (0.61 vs. 0.67, P < 0.001). However, 28-day mortality does not differ (25/138 vs. 36/136; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.08; P = 0.11). These findings suggest that RRI-guided MAP titration improves renal hemodynamics but does not reduce mortality in this single-center trial; multicenter confirmation is warranted. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200057136, registered 1 March 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=153154 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: