Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review evaluates antifungal efficacy of copper complexes against fungal biofilms, indicating potential for further development.
Copper coordination complexes have attracted increasing attention as tunable systems for antifungal applications, particularly in biofilm-associated infections. This systematic review evaluates their antibiofilm activity against opportunistic fungal pathogens, with emphasis on coordination-driven structure-activity relationships. The objective was to assess how ligand donor set, nuclearity, coordination number, and geometry influence antifungal behavior. Original studies (2015–2025) investigating molecular copper complexes and reporting biofilm-related outcomes against Candida, Cryptococcus, or Aspergillus were included, while nanoparticles and systems lacking well-defined coordination environments were excluded. Searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus (last search: February 5, 2026). Risk of bias was assessed using predefined criteria, and results were synthesized qualitatively due to heterogeneity. Six studies were included, comprising seven copper(II) complexes, predominantly mononuclear N- or mixed N,O-donor species, with coordination numbers from four to six. These compounds showed inhibition of biofilm formation (≈10–70%) and limited activity against established biofilms (MBEC = 31.25–61.6 µg/mL). Mechanistic evidence was limited and heterogeneous. The small number of studies and variability in experimental methods limit robust structure–activity correlations. Nevertheless, copper coordination complexes represent a promising platform for antifungal antibiofilm design. Protocol registered at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/k4r8j).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: