Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates acoustic radiation prediction in submerged structures, suggesting enhanced reconstruction accuracy.
Accurate characterization of acoustic radiation from submerged structures is crucial for underwater noise assessment and vibro-acoustic analysis. In practical engineering, acoustic measurements are often confined to limited near-field regions and contaminated by noise, rendering sound field reconstruction an ill-posed inverse problem. The conventional Equivalent Source Method (ESM), employing Tikhonov regularization, typically yields over-smoothed solutions prone to spurious artifacts. In contrast, compressive sensing approaches using [Formula: see text]-norm regularization often suffer from amplitude bias in source strength estimation. To address these limitations, this study proposes a physically consistent reconstruction framework for underwater structural acoustic radiation. The non-convex Generalized Minimax-Concave (GMC) penalty is utilized to promote sparsity while mitigating the amplitude bias inherent in convex regularization. To overcome the inherent non-sparsity of submerged elastic structures in the spatial domain, acoustic radiation modes are employed. This transformation maps the dense source distribution into a sparse modal domain, inducing the requisite sparsity. The resulting optimization problem is solved within the framework of the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). Numerical investigations on a complex cone-cylinder-sphere assembly demonstrate that the proposed method yields superior reconstruction accuracy and robustness compared to conventional techniques. The method suppresses spatial aliasing artifacts, especially in sparse measurement scenarios. Furthermore, a sparsity analysis is conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed sparse representation strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: