Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates adhesive performance of a self-cure bulk-fill composite, suggesting superior adhesion after cycling.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the adhesive performance of a new self-cure bulk-fill restorative system compared with conventional and light-cured bulk-fill resin composites after mechanical and thermal cycling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ), which were submitted to microtensile bond strength testing. The remaining specimens were submitted to mechanical cycling; subsequently, beams were thermocycled and tested. Three beams from each group were subjected to nanoleakage testing to obtain illustrative images. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were performed, with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: No difference on bond strength was observed among groups after 24 h (p > 0.05). Although all restorative systems showed adhesion reduction, self-cure bulk-fill resin composite showed higher values compared to other resin composites after cycling (p < 0.05). Nanoleakage images revealed a continuous adhesive interface between the self-cure bulk-fill composite and dentin, which was maintained after cycling. CONCLUSIONS: New self-cure bulk-fill resin composite showed initially similar adhesive performance to other restorative systems; however, it demonstrated superior adhesion after mechanical and thermal aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perazza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: