Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores oral-nasal balance variability in children with cleft lip and palate, highlighting the need for careful assessment over time.
The accurate assessment of oral-nasal balance disorders in children with cleft lip and palate is a perennial problem in Speech-Language Pathology. Nasalance scores obtained with a nasometer can contribute to the diagnosis of oral-nasal balance disorders. The present study investigated how consistent such classifications are over time. Twenty-seven children with cleft lip and palate were recorded six times with a nasometer headset over the course of an orthodontic palatal expansion treatment. Nasalance scores were considered hypernasal when they were higher than 30% for a non-nasal sentence and hyponasal when they were below 50% for a nasal sentence. Based on the nasalance scores, normal nasalance was found in 42.6%, hyponasality in 34.0%, and hypernasality in 23.5% of 162 sound recordings. Only 7/ 27 (25.9%) of the children had the same nasalance-based classification over the six sessions. The others demonstrated variability that straddled two adjacent categories in 15/ 27 (55.6%) of cases and all three categories in 5/ 27 (18.5%) of cases. While clinicians may wish to assign a permanent oral-nasal balance classification to their patients, the study demonstrated that a subset may show unexpected variability over time. More research is needed to establish whether it would be beneficial in some cases to explore this potential for variability before long-term decisions about a patient's clinical management are made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bressmann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: