Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study reconstructs chronology for early Upper Palaeolithic sites in Japan, suggesting cultural complexity development.
The major expansion of Homo sapiens represented by the Initial Upper Palaeolithic is one of the most significant prehistoric events in Eurasia, potentially leading to the replacement of archaic humans by Homo sapiens or the exploitation of new territories. Recent genetic studies suggest that Initial Upper Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers, or their descendant populations, expanded further east beyond the distribution area of Initial Upper Palaeolithic sites. However, the early Upper Palaeolithic sites, which appeared around 38 ka in Japan, are distinct and exhibit cultural traditions different from the Initial Upper Palaeolithic or other early Upper Palaeolithic assemblages in eastern Eurasia. The origins of the Japanese early Upper Palaeolithic remain unknown, and their formation process has yet to be quantitatively confirmed. In this study, we reconstruct a precise absolute chronology for Japanese early Upper Palaeolithic sites using reliable radiocarbon dating and examine the spatiotemporal patterns of early Upper Palaeolithic components. The results indicate that the number of early Upper Palaeolithic sites expanded between 36 and 34 ka, and the early Upper Palaeolithic assemblages indicate high complexity at this phase. The expansion of the population size between 36–34 ka would have provided hunter-gatherers with the opportunity for creating new tools and technologies and sharing them among different groups, leading to distinctive, complex early Upper Palaeolithic assemblages widespread in Japan. Early Upper Palaeolithic stone tools appear in Japan around 38 thousand years ago and are unique from contemporaneous tools found elsewhere in eastern Eurasia. Here, the authors present an absolute chronology for the early Upper Palaeolithic in Japan with 453 radiocarbon dates, contextualizing the formation of this complex industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Totsuka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: