Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares mental health outcomes in preadolescents with and without late talking, suggesting early intervention is crucial.
Purpose: This study compared mental health outcomes in preadolescents with and without a history of late talking (HLT) to determine whether outcomes cascade from early language ability, considering ecological and early mental health factors. Method: We included 52 Mandarin-speaking preadolescents (100% Han Chinese) 9–11 years of age: 26 with HLT ( M = 10.15 years, SD = 0.34; 20 boys, six girls) and 26 without HLT ( M = 10.20 years, SD = 0.38; 17 boys, nine girls). Both groups had comparable nonverbal cognitive abilities ( p = .721). The mental health outcomes assessed, based on parents' reports and participants' performance in laboratory tasks, included conceptual learning for adaptation, competence and emotion, self-regulation, and autism-like characteristics. Early language ability was assessed during toddlerhood (24–32 months of age) and the preschool period (48–57 months of age). Results: Preadolescents with HLT performed worse in conceptual learning, self-regulation, and social functioning than those without HLT ( η p 2 s = .08–.20), indicating medium-to-large effect sizes. These three domains were associated with early language ability, showing moderate correlations ( r s = .31–.52 or −.28 to −.41). Conclusions: Preadolescents with HLT had more mental health problems than those without HLT, which was linked to early language abilities. Their mental health should be understood from a developmental cascade perspective, emphasizing early identification and intervention, starting in childhood. Monitoring mental health may be particularly important during the transition to formal schooling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: