Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic literature review explores ecosystem resilience through interaction patterns and frameworks.
Purpose This paper aims to explore how interaction patterns enable resilience in business ecosystems facing turbulent environments. While organisational-level resilience has been extensively studied, how resilience emerges at the ecosystem level through relational mechanisms has received little systematic attention. This study addresses that gap using the industrial marketing and purchasing (IMP) perspective as a theoretical lens. The theoretical contribution is directed at ecosystem resilience research. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a systematic literature review of 30 peer-reviewed articles from three journals, Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing and Journal of Business Research. The IMP perspective served as the guiding analytical lens for interpreting the final sample. Findings Their analysis reveals three distinct research streams: Resilient Innovation Ecosystems, Resilient Service Ecosystems and Resilient Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, each demonstrating recurring interaction patterns enabling resilience through distinct value logics. They introduce the Circle of Resilience framework, showing that ecosystem resilience emerges through bidirectional processes across four interconnected levels, enacted through four recurring interaction patterns: multi-level coordination, coevolutionary adaptation, resource mobilisation and knowledge sharing. Practical implications Insights are provided for managers, policymakers and ecosystem orchestrators on enhancing resilience through relational investment, cross-boundary coordination and ecosystem-specific interaction pattern management. Policymakers are recognised not merely as external facilitators but as direct participants in the interaction patterns through which ecosystem resilience is developed and sustained. Originality/value This study adopts a theory adaptation approach, using the IMP perspective to illuminate what has not yet been specified in ecosystem resilience research. It identifies interaction patterns as the primary relational mechanisms through which ecosystem-level resilience is enacted, introduces three ecosystem-specific value logics and presents the Circle of Resilience framework as a conceptual foundation for future empirical work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parodi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: