Why the study?
To investigate whether the prognostic value of echocardiographic parameters changed with updated treatment guidelines and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, and to compare cardiac parameters between patients from the first and second COVID-19 waves.
Does reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS) predict COVID-related mortality in hospitalized patients?
Cohort (n=305)
Does reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS) predict COVID-related mortality in hospitalized patients?
Reduced global longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of COVID-related mortality in hospitalized patients, regardless of the pandemic wave or treatment.
Echocardiographic parameters may aid COVID-19 prognosis across waves; leaves open whether value shifts with variants or guidelines.
INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has spread globally in waves, and Danish treatment guidelines have been updated following the first wave. We sought to investigate whether the prognostic values of echocardiographic parameters changed with updates in treatment guidelines and the emergence of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, 20E (EU1) and alpha (B.1.1.7), and further to compare cardiac parameters between patients from the first and second wave. METHODS: A total of 305 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were prospectively included, 215 and 90 during the first and second wave, respectively. Treatment in the study was defined as treatment with remdesivir, dexamethasone, or both. Patients were assumed to be infected with the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant at the time of their hospitalization. RESULTS: Mean age for the first versus second wave was 68.7 ± 13.6 versus 69.7 ± 15.8 years, and 55% versus 62% were males. Left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function was worse in patients hospitalized during the second wave (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] for first vs. second wave = 58.5 ± 8.1% vs. 52.4 ± 10.6%, p < 0.001; and global longitudinal strain [GLS] = 16.4 ± 4.3% vs. 14.2 ± 4.3%, p < 0.001). In univariable Cox regressions, reduced LVEF (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07 per 1% decrease, p = 0.002), GLS (HR = 1.21 per 1% decrease, p < 0.001), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (HR = 1.18 per 1 mm decrease, p < 0.001) were associated with COVID-related mortality, but only GLS remained significant in fully adjusted analysis (HR = 1.14, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Reduced GLS was associated with COVID-related mortality independently of wave, treatment, and the SARS-CoV-2 variant. LV function was significantly impaired in patients hospitalized during the second wave.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in COVID-19 (n=305). Reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS) vs. per 1% decrease was evaluated on COVID-related mortality (HR 1.14, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: