Key result
Policy decisions by donors and global health organizations to support vaccination campaigns rather than building health systems shape local polio vaccine acceptance and refusal.
Global policy decisions prioritizing vaccination campaigns over health system building shape local behaviors regarding vaccine acceptance and refusal.
Donor policies favoring campaigns over systems may shape polio vaccine refusal; leaves open how health system investments affect acceptance.
Many of medical anthropology's most pressing research questions require an understanding how infections, money, and ideas move around the globe. The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) is a $9 billion project that has delivered 20 billion doses of oral polio vaccine in campaigns across the world. With its array of global activities, it cannot be comprehensively explored by the traditional anthropological method of research at one field site. This article describes an ethnographic study of the GPEI, a collaborative effort between researchers at eight sites in seven countries. We developed a methodology grounded in nuanced understandings of local context but structured to allow analysis of global trends. Here, we examine polio vaccine acceptance and refusal to understand how global phenomena-in this case, policy decisions by donors and global health organizations to support vaccination campaigns rather than building health systems-shape local behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Closser et al. (2016) studied Polio vaccine acceptance and refusal. Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) vaccination campaigns was evaluated on Polio vaccine acceptance and refusal. Policy decisions by donors and global health organizations to support vaccination campaigns rather than building health systems shape local polio vaccine acceptance and refusal.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: