Key result
Daily sugar-sweetened beverage intake is linked to ~29% greater visceral adipose tissue accumulation over 6 years.
Why the study?
Does habitual sugar-sweetened beverage consumption increase visceral adipose tissue volume over 6 years in adults?
Cohort (n=1,003)
Does habitual sugar-sweetened beverage consumption increase visceral adipose tissue volume over 6 years in adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 852% vs 658%
p-value: p=<0.001
Regular consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with adverse increases in visceral adipose tissue volume over time, independent of body weight changes.
BACKGROUND: Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake has been linked to abnormal abdominal adipose tissue. We examined the prospective association of habitual SSB intake and change in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue. METHODS AND RESULTS: The quantity (volume, cm(3)) and quality (attenuation, Hounsfield Unit) of abdominal adipose tissue were measured using computed tomography in 1003 participants (mean age 45.3 years, 45.0% women) at examination 1 and 2 in the Framingham's Third Generation cohort. The 2 exams were ≈ 6 years apart. At baseline, SSB and diet soda intake were assessed using a valid food frequency questionnaire. Participants were categorized into 4 groups: none to <1 serving/mo (nonconsumers), 1 serving/mo to <1 serving/week, 1 serving/week to 1 serving/d, and ≥ 1 serving/d (daily consumers) of either SSB or diet soda. After adjustment for multiple confounders including change in body weight, higher SSB intake was associated with greater change in VAT volume (P trend<0.001). VAT volume increased by 658 cm(3) (95% confidence interval [CI], 602 to 713), 649 cm(3) (95% CI, 582 to 716), 707 cm(3) (95% CI, 657 to 757), and 852 cm(3) (95% CI, 760 to 943) from nonconsumers to daily consumers. Higher SSB intake was also associated with greater decline of VAT attenuation (P trend=0.007); however, the association became nonsignificant after additional adjustment for VAT volume change. In contrast, diet soda consumption was not associated with change in abdominal adipose tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Regular SSB intake was associated with adverse change in both VAT quality and quantity, whereas we observed no such association for diet soda.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2016) reported a cohort. Sugar-sweetened beverage intake vs. Nonconsumers (none to <1 serving/mo) was evaluated on Change in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume (p=<0.001). Higher sugar-sweetened beverage intake was associated with a greater increase in visceral adipose tissue volume over 6 years (852 cm3 in daily consumers vs 658 cm3 in nonconsumers; P trend<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: