Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accumulating clinical evidence, along with increasing consideration of safety and medical costs, has led to growing discussion regarding treatment discontinuation at around 2 years in patients with durable disease control. However, opportunities to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients who continue ICI therapy beyond 2 years are increasingly limited. Methods This multicenter retrospective study included patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI for ≥ 25 months at 17 hospitals in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan, between December 2015 and May 2025. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from the 24-month landmark. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), clinical characteristics, 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) after discontinuation, late-onset immune-related adverse events (irAEs), reasons for ICI discontinuation, and outcomes of ICI rechallenge. Results A total of 158 patients were analyzed. The median age was 69 years; 81% were male, 58% had adenocarcinoma, and 88% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1. From the 24-month landmark, PFS rates were 85.6% at 1 year, 80.7% at 2 years, 78.5% at 3 years, and 62.4% at 5 years. Corresponding OS rates were 97.9%, 93.8%, 89.2%, and 77.1%, respectively. The median landmark PFS was 83.6 months; OS was not reached. A total of 24 late-onset irAEs were recorded after ≥ 2 years, with pulmonary events comprising 29.2%. Conclusion In Japanese patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs for more than 2 years, landmark PFS was 83.6 months and OS was not reached, indicating durable outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogata et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: