Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Sport participation can both enhance and undermine adolescents' well-being. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine associations of perceived task- and ego-involving motivational climates with anxiety, depressive, and stress symptoms and global self-esteem among youth athletes, and to test whether perceived motivational climate varied by athlete and coach gender. Methods: A total of 522 handball players (aged 14-17 years) participated in the study. Participants completed the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Results: Overall, handball players perceived their teams as more task- than ego-involving, although male athletes reported lower task-involving climate than female athletes. Perceived task-involving climate was associated with lower anxiety, depressive, and stress symptoms and higher self-esteem, whereas ego-involving climate showed the opposite pattern. Together, motivational climate variables accounted for a statistically significant proportion of variance in anxiety, depressive, and stress symptoms, as well as self-esteem. In regression analyses, higher task-involving climate was associated with higher self-esteem, whereas higher ego-involving climate was associated with lower self-esteem and showed stronger associations with anxiety, depressive, and stress symptoms. Among female athletes, those coached by men perceived lower task-involving and higher ego-involving climates than those coached by women. Conclusion: Fostering a task-involving climate while minimising ego-involving cues may be relevant for supporting youth athletes' psychological well-being. The findings highlight the importance of coach education that addresses the psychological risks of an ego-involving motivational climate and promotes coaching practices that foster supportive, task-involving environments for youth handball players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jurakić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: