Key result
Deep learning on single-lead mobile ECGs during NSR detects prior AF with 0.79 AUC.
Why the study?
The potential of using artificial intelligence to identify atrial fibrillation from single-lead mobile ECGs during normal sinus rhythm remains under-explored.
Can deep learning models accurately identify atrial fibrillation using single-lead mobile ECGs during normal sinus rhythm?
Observational (n=5,170)
No
Can deep learning models accurately identify atrial fibrillation using single-lead mobile ECGs during normal sinus rhythm?
Deep learning applied to single-lead mobile ECGs during normal sinus rhythm can identify patients with atrial fibrillation, though performance requires further enhancement for clinical use.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI-based AF detection from single-lead NSR ECG may be feasible; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: The acquisition of single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) from mobile devices offers a more practical approach to arrhythmia detection. Using artificial intelligence for atrial fibrillation (AF) identification enhances screening efficiency. However, the potential of single-lead ECG for AF identification during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) remains under-explored. This study introduces a method to identify AF using single-lead mobile ECG during NSR. METHODS: We employed three deep learning models: recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and residual neural networks (ResNet50). From a dataset comprising 13,509 ECGs from 6,719 patients, 10,287 NSR ECGs from 5,170 patients were selected. Single-lead mobile ECGs underwent noise filtering and segmentation into 10-second intervals. A random under-sampling was applied to reduce bias from data imbalance. The final analysis involved 31,767 ECG segments, including 15,157 labeled as masked AF and 16,610 as Healthy. RESULTS: ResNet50 outperformed the other models, achieving a recall of 79.3%, precision of 65.8%, F1-score of 71.9%, accuracy of 70.5%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.79 in identifying AF from NSR ECGs. Comparative performance scores for RNN and LSTM were 0.75 and 0.74, respectively. In an external validation set, ResNet50 attained an F1-score of 64.1%, recall of 68.9%, precision of 60.0%, accuracy of 63.4%, and AUC of 0.68. CONCLUSION: The deep learning model using single-lead mobile ECG during NSR effectively identified AF at risk in future. However, further research is needed to enhance the performance of deep learning models for clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=5,170). ResNet50 deep learning model on single-lead mobile ECG vs. RNN and LSTM models was evaluated on Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for identifying AF from NSR ECGs (AUC 0.79). A ResNet50 deep learning model using 10-second single-lead mobile ECG segments during normal sinus rhythm identified patients with a history of atrial fibrillation with an AUC of 0.79.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: