Key result
Multi-sensor wearables improve neonatal seizure detection over single-modal detectors by reducing false alarms.
Why the study?
Video electroencephalogram technology for neonatal seizure monitoring has disadvantages, including wire interference with movement and electrode-induced skin allergies or tears.
Does a multi-modal wearable sensor system based on ECG, respiration, and acceleration improve neonatal seizure detection compared to single-modal detectors?
Observational (n=38)
No
Does a multi-modal wearable sensor system based on ECG, respiration, and acceleration improve neonatal seizure detection compared to single-modal detectors?
A wearable multi-sensor platform combining ECG, respiration, and acceleration improves automated neonatal seizure detection by reducing false alarms and increasing F-measures compared to single-modality detectors.
May warrant caution in neonatal monitoring; leaves open whether bioengineering alternatives improve on VEEG.
Neonatal seizure is an important clinical symptom of brain dysfunction, which is more common in infancy than in childhood. At present, video electroencephalogram (VEEG) technology is widely used in clinical practice. However, video electroencephalogram technology has several disadvantages. For example, the wires connecting the medical instruments may interfere with the infant's movement and the gel patch electrode or disk electrode commonly used to monitor EEG may cause skin allergies or even tears. For the above reasons, we developed a wearable multi-sensor platform for newborns to collect physiological and movement signals. In this study, we designed a second-generation multi-sensor platform and developed an automatic detection algorithm for neonatal seizures based on ECG, respiration and acceleration. Data for 38 neonates were recorded at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai. The total recording time was approximately 300 h. Four of the patients had seizures during data collection. The total recording time for the four patients was approximately 34 h, with 30 seizure episodes recorded. These data were evaluated by the algorithm. To evaluate the effectiveness of combining ECG, respiration and movement, we compared the performance of three types of seizure detectors. The first detector included features from ECG, respiration and acceleration records; the second detector incorporated features based on respiratory movement from respiration and acceleration records; and the third detector used only ECG-based features from ECG records. Our study illustrated that, compared with the detector utilizing individual modal features, multi-modal feature detectors could achieve favorable overall performance, reduce false alarm rates and give higher F-measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Neonatal seizures (n=38). Wearable multi-sensor platform (ECG, respiration, and acceleration) vs. Individual modal feature detectors was evaluated on Seizure detection performance (false alarm rates and F-measures). A wearable multi-sensor platform combining ECG, respiration, and acceleration improved neonatal seizure detection by reducing false alarm rates and increasing F-measures compared to single-modal detectors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: