Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Individual surface weather observations from land stations and ships are compared with individual cloud retrievals of the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP), stage C1, for an 8-yr period (1983– 91) to relate cloud optical thicknesses and cloud-top pressures obtained from satellite data to the standard cloud types reported in visual observations from the surface. Each surface report is matched to the corresponding ISCCP-C1 report for the time of observation for the 280 km 3 280 km grid box containing that observation. Classes of the surface reports are identified in which a particular cloud type was reported present, either alone or in combination with other clouds. For each class, cloud amounts from both surface and C1 data, base heights from surface data, and the frequency distributions of cloud-top pressure ( pc) and optical thickness (t) from C1 data are averaged over 158 latitude zones, for land and ocean separately, for 3-month seasons. The frequency distribution of pc and t is plotted for each of the surface-defined cloud types occurring both alone and with other clouds. The average cloud-top pressures within a grid box do not always correspond well with values expected for a reported cloud type, particularly for the higher clouds Ci, Ac, and Cb. In many cases this is because the satellites also detect clouds within the grid box that are outside the field of view of the surface observer. The
Hahn et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: