Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 19, 2006American Journal of Roentgenology

Diagnostic Performance of MDCT for Detecting Aortic Valve Regurgitation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

16-MDCT coronary angiography detected aortic regurgitation with an overall sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 91%, rising to 95% and 96% for moderate and severe cases.

Why the study?

Does ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography accurately detect aortic regurgitation compared to Doppler TTE in patients evaluated for AR?

Population

71 patients evaluated prospectively for aortic regurgitation

Comparison

ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography using… vs Doppler transthoracic echocardiography based on…

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

GFGudrun FeuchtnerCardiac Imaging
Wolfgang Dichtl
Wolfgang DichtlElectrophysiology
TSThomas SchachnerInnsbruck Medical University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support 16-MDCT for moderate-severe AR detection; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=71)

Structured PICO

Does ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography accurately detect aortic regurgitation compared to Doppler TTE in patients evaluated for AR?

P
Population
71 patients evaluated prospectively for aortic regurgitation using 16-MDCT compared to Doppler TTE.
E
Exposure
ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography using retrospective ECG gating during the mid-to-end diastolic phase
C
Comparator
Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) based on semiquantitative regurgitation jet analysis
O
Outcome
Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) for detecting aortic regurgitationsurrogate

Main Result

Effect estimate: Sensitivity 81%, Specificity 91%

16-MDCT coronary angiography is an accurate noninvasive tool for detecting moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, but its utility is limited in mild cases and by severe valve calcification.

Limitations

  • Severe valve calcifications preventing quantification in 50% of cases
  • Limited accuracy for mild aortic regurgitation
  • severe valve calcifications
  • mild AR limits results

Cite This Study

Feuchtner et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic regurgitation (n=71). 16-MDCT coronary angiography vs. Doppler TTE was evaluated on Detection of aortic regurgitation (Sensitivity 81%, Specificity 91%). 16-MDCT coronary angiography detected aortic regurgitation with an overall sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 91%, rising to 95% and 96% for moderate and severe cases.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5d2f497d25ef04d2c51682https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.05.0967
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease2006 · 8,514 citations
  2. 2Progression of Aortic Valve Calcification2001 · 404 citations
  3. 3Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease1998 · 1,041 citations
  4. 4Electrocardiographically Gated Multi–Detector Row CT for Assessment of Valvular Morphology and Calcification in Aortic Stenosis2002 · 177 citations
  5. 5Clinical Factors Associated With Calcific Aortic Valve Disease1997 · 2,030 citations