Key result
16-MDCT coronary angiography detected aortic regurgitation with an overall sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 91%, rising to 95% and 96% for moderate and severe cases.
Why the study?
Does ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography accurately detect aortic regurgitation compared to Doppler TTE in patients evaluated for AR?
Population
71 patients evaluated prospectively for aortic regurgitation
Comparison
ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography using… vs Doppler transthoracic echocardiography based on…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support 16-MDCT for moderate-severe AR detection; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Cross-Sectional (n=71)
Does ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography accurately detect aortic regurgitation compared to Doppler TTE in patients evaluated for AR?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 81%, Specificity 91%
16-MDCT coronary angiography is an accurate noninvasive tool for detecting moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, but its utility is limited in mild cases and by severe valve calcification.
Feuchtner et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic regurgitation (n=71). 16-MDCT coronary angiography vs. Doppler TTE was evaluated on Detection of aortic regurgitation (Sensitivity 81%, Specificity 91%). 16-MDCT coronary angiography detected aortic regurgitation with an overall sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 91%, rising to 95% and 96% for moderate and severe cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: