Key result
Blood flow restriction exercise was performed safely with no reported adverse events and improved skeletal muscle strength, endurance, and cardiorespiratory performance in patients with heart disease and heart failure.
Why the study?
Research examining blood flow restriction exercise in heart disease and heart failure is increasing, prompting use of the Muscle Hypothesis of Chronic Heart Failure to elucidate its effects.
Does blood flow restriction exercise improve physical performance and cardiovascular function in adults with heart disease or heart failure?
Systematic Review (n=140)
Does blood flow restriction exercise improve physical performance and cardiovascular function in adults with heart disease or heart failure?
Blood flow restriction exercise appears safe and may improve skeletal muscle and cardiovascular performance in patients with heart disease and heart failure, though more comprehensive studies are needed.
BFR exercise may be considered in cardiac rehab; extends safety and efficacy signals but leaves optimal protocols and long-term outcomes open.
Background: Blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) has become a common method to increase skeletal muscle strength and hypertrophy for individuals with a variety of conditions. A substantial literature of BFRE in older adults exists in which significant gains in strength and functional performance have been observed without report of adverse events. Research examining the effects of BFRE in heart disease (HD) and heart failure (HF) appears to be increasing for which reason the Muscle Hypothesis of Chronic Heart Failure (MHCHF) will be used to fully elucidate the effects BFRE may have in patients with HD and HF highlighted in the MHCHF. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane library through February 2022. Inclusion criteria were: 1) the study was original research conducted in human subjects older than 18 years of age and diagnosed with either HD or HF, 2) study participants performed BFRE, and 3) post-intervention outcome measures of cardiovascular function, physical performance, skeletal muscle function and structure, and/or systemic biomarkers were provided. Exclusion criteria included review articles and articles on viewpoints and opinions of BFRE, book chapters, theses, dissertations, and case study articles. Results: Seven BFRE studies in HD and two BFRE studies in HF were found of which four of the HD and the two HF studies examined a variety of measures reflected within the MHCHF over a period of 8–24 weeks. No adverse events were reported in any of the studies and significant improvements in skeletal muscle strength, endurance, and work as well as cardiorespiratory performance, mitochondrial function, exercise tolerance, functional performance, immune humoral function, and possibly cardiac performance were observed in one or more of the reviewed studies. Conclusion: In view of the above systematic review, BFRE has been performed safely with no report of adverse event in patients with a variety of different types of HD and in patients with HF. The components of the MHCHF that can be potentially improved with BFRE include left ventricular dysfunction, inflammatory markers, inactivity, a catabolic state, skeletal and possibly respiratory muscle myopathy, dyspnea and fatigue, ANS activity, and peripheral blood flow. Furthermore, investigation of feasibility, acceptability, adherence, adverse effects, and symptoms during and after BFRE is needed since very few studies have examined these important issues comprehensively in patients with HD and HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cahalin et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Heart disease and heart failure (n=140). Blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) vs. Non-BFRE exercise or no intervention was evaluated on Cardiovascular function, physical performance, skeletal muscle function and structure, and systemic biomarkers. Blood flow restriction exercise was performed safely with no reported adverse events and improved skeletal muscle strength, endurance, and cardiorespiratory performance in patients with heart disease and heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: