Key result
In diabetic patients with STEMI and no previous atrial fibrillation, a one-point increment in the CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with a 24% increase in the risk of 12-month mortality (HR 1.24) and a 101% increase in the risk of 12-month stroke (HR 2.01).
Why the study?
Does the CHA2DS2-VASc score predict poor 12-month outcomes in diabetic patients with STEMI without atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=472)
No
Does the CHA2DS2-VASc score predict poor 12-month outcomes in diabetic patients with STEMI without atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a useful, simple tool for predicting 12-month mortality and stroke in diabetic patients presenting with STEMI without atrial fibrillation.
AIMS: TIMI risk score and GRACE risk model are widely available and accepted scores for risk assessment in STEMI patients and include predictors of poor outcomes. CHA2DS2-VASc is a validated score for predicting embolic/stroke risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Its components contribute to the worse prognosis following myocardial infarction. The advantage of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in comparison with other risk scores is that it provides a comprehensive, fast, and simple method for physicians in risk evaluation that requires no calculators or computers. Therefore, we have set out to examine the prognostic significance of CHA2DS2-VASc score following STEMI in diabetic patients without AF. METHODS: A total of 472 patients with diabetes mellitus and STEMI undergoing primary PCI were enrolled. Based on the estimated CHA2DS2-VASc score, the study population was divided into three groups: group 1 (N = 111) with a moderate CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or 3; group 2 (N = 257) with a high CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4 or 5; and group 3 (N = 104) with a very high CHA2DS2-VASc score of 6 or higher. RESULTS: In diabetic patients with STEMI, the median of CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (interquartile range 3-5). In-hospital mortality rate was similar across three groups. CHA2DS2-VASc score was not a risk factor of in-hospital mortality. ROC analysis revealed good diagnostic value of CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting long-term mortality (AUC 0.62 95 % CI 0.57-0.66 P = 0.0003) and stroke (AUC 0.75 95 % CI 0.71-0.79 P = 0.0003), but no value in predicting long-term myocardial infarction. CHA2DS2-VASc score was an independent predictor of 12-month mortality and stroke. One-point increment in CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with an increase in the risk of 12-month death by 24 % and for 12-month stroke by 101 %. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with STEMI and no previous AF, median CHA2DS2-VASc score was high (4 points) and predicted 12-month death and stroke. However, it failed to predict in-hospital death and 12-month MI. CHA2DS2-VASc score had a similar discrimination performance in predicting 12-month mortality as TIMI risk score and a better discrimination performance in predicting 12-month stroke than TIMI risk score. Thus, it can serve as an additive tool in identifying high-risk patients that require aggressive management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hudzik et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in diabetic patients without atrial fibrillation (n=472). CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated on 12-month mortality (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45, p=0.008). In diabetic patients with STEMI and no previous atrial fibrillation, a one-point increment in the CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with a 24% increase in the risk of 12-month mortality (HR 1.24) and a 101% increase in the risk of 12-month stroke (HR 2.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: