Why the study?
A research gap exists in applying the prognostic value of the CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system to patients with stroke who do not have atrial fibrillation.
Does a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (score 2 or >2 vs 0-1) predict 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke without atrial fibrillation?
Does a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (score 2 or >2 vs 0-1) predict 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke without atrial fibrillation?
The CHA2DS2-VASc score independently predicts 1-year MACE, all-cause mortality, and recurrent stroke in patients with acute ischemic stroke without atrial fibrillation, supporting its clinical utility for post-stroke risk stratification beyond AF populations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports closer surveillance of high-score non-AF AIS patients; leaves open whether CHA2DS2-VASc should influence secondary prevention.
Background: Although the prognostic value of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, and female sex) scoring system in patients with stroke has been explored in several studies, a research gap exists in its application, especially in patients without atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: This study investigated the association between CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and prognosis at 1 year in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who do not have AF. A total of 993 patients with AIS but without AF were recruited between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into high-risk (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, >2; n = 424), moderate-risk (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, 2; n = 218), and low-risk (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, 0-1; n = 351) groups. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year after index AIS. Multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the prognostic value of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores after controlling for potential confounding factors. A sensitivity analysis was performed based on 3 CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc groups generated using propensity score matching. Results: The rate of MACE during 12-month follow-up was statistically significantly higher ( P < .01) in patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score greater than 2 (34.7%) than in patients with a score of 2 (23.9%) or of 0 or 1 (14.8%). Multivariate Cox regression models indicated that, compared with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 0 or 1, the hazard ratio (HR) of MACE occurrence was 3.22 (95% CI, 1.93-5.37; P < .01) for a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score greater than 2 and 1.92 (95% CI, 1.24-2.98; P < .01) for a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 2. When included in the Cox regression model as a continuous variable, the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score remained strongly associated with higher risks of MACE (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.11-1.26]; P < .01), all-cause mortality (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]; P < .01), and recurrent stroke (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.06-1.256]; P < .01). Sensitivity analyses based on populations generated by propensity score matching yielded similar results. Conclusion: The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score effectively predicts MACE in patients with AIS but without AF, providing more accurate risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: