Key result
Warfarin achieves optimal anticoagulation in only ~25% of Chinese patients with non-valvular AF.
Why the study?
Several factors determine the efficacy of warfarin anticoagulation in NVAF, but anticoagulation control in Chinese patients needed assessment using registry data.
Does long-term warfarin therapy achieve adequate anticoagulation control (TTR ≥70%) in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=1,895)
Yes
Does long-term warfarin therapy achieve adequate anticoagulation control (TTR ≥70%) in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Warfarin anticoagulation control in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation is generally suboptimal, with most failing to achieve a TTR ≥70%.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suboptimal TTR with warfarin in Chinese non-valvular AF patients cautions against assuming adequate control; leaves open whether NOACs or interventions improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND Several factors determine the efficacy of warfarin anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study aimed to use data from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study to assess the control of anticoagulation therapy in Chinese patients with NVAF treated with warfarin. MATERIAL AND METHODS From the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study the anticoagulant use and dosing, the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the international normalized ratio (INR), and standard deviation of the observed INR values (SDINR), and their influencing factors were evaluated. RESULTS The median INR and SDINR were 2.04 (IQR 1.71-2.41) and 0.50 (IQR, 0.35-0.69), respectively. The median TTR was 51.7% (IQR, 30.6-70.1%) and only 25.1% had a TTR ≥70%. Age was ≥70 years (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.94; P=0.015), bleeding history (OR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.89; P=0.029), the use of a single drug (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92; P=0.016), more than drug (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88; P=0.009), and lack of assessment of bleeding risk (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97; P=0.033) were associated with TTR <70% (INR 2.0-3.0). Coronary heart disease (CHD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; P=0.007) and diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99; P=0.044) were associated with increased variability in INR (SDINR ≥0.5). CONCLUSIONS In Chinese patients with NVAF, warfarin anticoagulation was associated with lower TTR and less stable anticoagulation than in current guidelines, and risk factors for reduced safety and efficacy were identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hai-feng et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=1,895). Warfarin therapy was evaluated on Time in therapeutic range (TTR) ≥70% with an INR target of 2.0-3.0. In Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin, the median time in therapeutic range was 51.7%, with only 25.1% achieving a TTR ≥70%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: