Key result
Hydroxychloroquine treatment in patients with suspected COVID-19 significantly increased the index of cardio-electrophysiological balance (iCEB) from 3.95 at baseline to 4.11 on the second day (p=0.047).
Why the study?
Hydroxychloroquine is widely given for COVID-19 and may increase arrhythmia risk linked to QT/QTc prolongation; its effect on iCEB, a new marker of drug-induced arrhythmia, needed evaluation.
Does short-course hydroxychloroquine treatment alter ventricular repolarization indices and iCEB in hospitalized patients with suspected COVID-19?
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
No
Does short-course hydroxychloroquine treatment alter ventricular repolarization indices and iCEB in hospitalized patients with suspected COVID-19?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.11% vs 3.95%
p-value: p=0.047
Short-course hydroxychloroquine in suspected COVID-19 patients significantly prolongs QT/QTc intervals and increases iCEB by the second day of treatment, highlighting the utility of iCEB for ECG monitoring of drug-induced arrhythmia risk.
Aim: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is widely administered to patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. It may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias associated with QT and QTc prolongation. This study aimed to assess the change in iCEB, a new marker of drug-induced arrhythmia, and other repolarization parameters in suspected COVID-19 patients treated with short-course HCQ. Material and Method: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study including 40 patients hospitalized with suspected COVID-19 according to the CT findings and treated with HCQ. Serial assessments of the QT and QTc intervals and the calculation of the index of cardio-electrophysiological balance (iCEB) were performed using standard 12 lead electrocardiogram before hydroxychloroquine treatment, on the second day of HCQ treatment, and after the day of the last administered dose. Results: QT, QTcB, QTcF, iCEB, iCEBcB significantly increased on the second day of HCQ treatment compared to baseline (p=0.009, p=0.001, p=0.002, p=0.047, p=0.05, respectively). Similarly, QT, QTcB, QTcF, iCEBcB and iCEBcF were significantly higher on the fifth day compared to baseline (p=0.011, p=0.005, p=0.005, p=0.013, p=0.028, p=0.024 respectively). However, there were no differences between the second and the fifth days of treatment for any of the studied parameters. Conclusions: QT, QTc, and iCEB significantly increased compared to baseline on the second day, and remained increased on the fifth day of treatment. The differences were attributed to the amount of loading dose and the duration of HCQ treatment. Our study suggests that, along with other ECG markers, iCEB can be used in COVID-19 patients treated with HCQ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ÇELİK et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected COVID-19 (n=40). Hydroxychloroquine vs. Baseline (pre-treatment) was evaluated on Index of cardio-electrophysiological balance (iCEB) on the second day of treatment (p=0.047). Hydroxychloroquine treatment in patients with suspected COVID-19 significantly increased the index of cardio-electrophysiological balance (iCEB) from 3.95 at baseline to 4.11 on the second day (p=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: