Key result
Prasugrel active metabolite inhibited thrombus platelet recruitment more gradually than ticagrelor, and a small fraction (<10%) of uninhibited platelets did not abrogate its antithrombotic effect.
Why the study?
It was unclear how the pharmacological differences between irreversible and reversible P2Y12 inhibitors affect thrombus formation when uninhibited platelet subpopulations arise.
Does the type of P2Y12 inhibition (reversible vs irreversible) affect thrombus formation and platelet recruitment in an ex vivo model?
Does the type of P2Y12 inhibition (reversible vs irreversible) affect thrombus formation and platelet recruitment in an ex vivo model?
In an ex vivo model, irreversible P2Y12 inhibition with prasugrel active metabolite showed a more gradual onset of inhibition compared to ticagrelor, but its antithrombotic effect was not significantly abrogated by a small fraction of uninhibited platelets.
Pharmacological inhibition of the platelet ADP-receptor P2Y12 is a cornerstone in the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Thienopyridines such as clopidogrel and prasugrel exert their antithrombotic effect by means of active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit P2Y12. Due to the short half-life of these metabolites, a subpopulation of ADP-responsive platelets will form in between dosing. With increased platelet turnover rate or poor patient compliance, the fraction of ADP-responsive platelets will increase, potentially increasing the risk for new thrombotic events. In contrast, the reversible P2Y12 inhibition produced by direct-acting ADP blockers such as ticagrelor and cangrelor inhibit the entire platelet population. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these pharmacological differences on thrombus formation in an ex vivo flow chamber model. A customized image analysis pipeline was used for automatized, large-scale identification and tracking of single platelets incorporated into the thrombus, enabling quantitative analysis of the relative contribution of inhibited and uninhibited platelets to thrombus growth and consolidation. Comparative experiments were conducted using the irreversible and reversible P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel active metabolite (PAM) and ticagrelor, respectively. Our results show that PAM inhibited thrombus platelet recruitment more gradually than ticagrelor, with a slower onset of inhibition. Further, we show that the presence of a small fraction (<10%) of uninhibited platelets did not abrogate the antithrombotic effect of PAM to any significant extent. Finally, we demonstrate a gradual enrichment of inhibited platelets in the thrombus shell due to selective recruitment of inhibited platelets to the thrombus periphery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tunströmer et al. (2023) studied Acute coronary syndrome. Prasugrel active metabolite (PAM) vs. Ticagrelor was evaluated on Thrombus formation and platelet recruitment in an ex vivo flow chamber model. Prasugrel active metabolite inhibited thrombus platelet recruitment more gradually than ticagrelor, and a small fraction (<10%) of uninhibited platelets did not abrogate its antithrombotic effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: