Key result
Noninvasive Vivio System detects elevated LVEDP with ~80% sensitivity versus invasive measurement.
Why the study?
Evaluating heart failure via LVEDP measurement requires an invasive procedure, creating a need for a noninvasive technique to detect elevated LVEDP.
Does the noninvasive Vivio System accurately detect elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>18 mm Hg) compared to invasive catheterization in adult patients?
Observational (n=417)
Yes
Does the noninvasive Vivio System accurately detect elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>18 mm Hg) compared to invasive catheterization in adult patients?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 0.80, Specificity 0.83 (95% CI 0.64-0.91)
A novel noninvasive brachial cuff-ECG system can accurately identify elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, potentially facilitating earlier detection of heart failure in primary care settings.
May enable noninvasive LVEDP detection in heart failure; leaves open larger validation trials before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an established diagnostic method to evaluate heart failure but requires an invasive procedure. A noninvasive technique for detecting elevated LVEDP would improve the diagnosis of heart failure. Herein, we present the results of a multicenter study to validate a noninvasive system to detect elevated LVEDP. METHODS: The Vivio System includes a modified blood pressure cuff and single-lead ECG to capture brachial artery waveforms. A model was created to identify patients with elevated LVEDP (>18 mm Hg). For the invasive cohort, all patients were referred for coronary angiography and left heart catheterization for clinical indications. A group of 321 patients with no significant health problems were enrolled as a control cohort. Invasive LVEDP measurements were performed using Millar catheters. The training data set (n=262) contained 101 patients with LVEDP measurements (n=44 with LVEDP >18 mm Hg) and 161 controls. The validation data set (n=155) contained 75 patients with LVEDP measurements (n=40 with LVEDP >18 mm Hg) and 80 controls. RESULTS: Leave-one-out cross-validation on the training data set yielded a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93]) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89). The validation data set showed a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91) and a specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The Vivio System can accurately detect elevated LVEDP and has the potential to significantly improve early detection of heart failure in the outpatient setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shavelle et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Elevated Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure (Heart Failure) (n=417). Vivio System vs. Invasive left heart catheterization was evaluated on Detection of elevated LVEDP (>18 mm Hg) in the validation data set (Sensitivity 0.80, Specificity 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-0.91). The noninvasive Vivio System accurately detected elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>18 mm Hg) with a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.83 in the validation cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: