Key result
Intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography during PTSMA was associated with higher acute (92% vs 70%; P<0.01) and mid-term (94% vs 64%; P<0.01) success compared to balloon occlusion alone.
Why the study?
Does intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography improve the success of percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy?
Population
91 symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, mean age 54.1 years, 46 women and 45…
Comparison
Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial… vs PTSMA with target vessel determination by…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
3 months
Authors
Loading...
PTSMA with MCE may reduce LVOTG in symptomatic HOCM; leaves open need for RCTs versus surgery.
Cohort (n=91)
Does intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography improve the success of percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 92% vs 70%
p-value: p=<0.01
PTSMA effectively reduces LVOTG and symptoms in HOCM, and the addition of intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography significantly improves procedural success rates.
Faber et al. (1998) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy (n=91). Intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) during PTSMA vs. Probatory balloon occlusion alone was evaluated on Acute success (p=<0.01). Intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography during PTSMA was associated with higher acute (92% vs 70%; P<0.01) and mid-term (94% vs 64%; P<0.01) success compared to balloon occlusion alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: