Effective N management practices are needed in high residue corn ( Zea mays L.) production systems to enhance N fertilizer efficiency and avoid yield reductions due to inadequate N supplies. This 4‐yr study was conducted on a well‐drained silt loam soil in southern Wisconsin (43°17′ N, 89°22′ E) to determine the effects of corn residue cover amounts on soil and residue N supplying capability, the effectiveness of several surface‐applied N fertilizers, and the relative importance of mechanisms potentially contributing to reduced N efficiency in no‐till corn systems. Treatments consisted of corn residue level [none (0×), normal (1×), twice normal (2×), and artificial (polypropylene) residue (AR1×)], N fertilizer source (ammonium nitrate, urea, and urea–ammonium nitrate solution), and N rate (0–225 kg N ha−1 in 45‐kg increments). Increasing residue levels lowered soil temperatures and early season soil NO 3 –N production, and reduced corn grain yields without applied N. Ammonia losses reduced the effectiveness of urea‐containing fertilizers but did not completely explain the observed N source differences. Nitrogen source effects were similar at all residue levels, suggesting that added N can overcome yield reductions at high residue levels. Yields, N mineralization, and soil temperature were similar in the 1× and AR1× residue treatments, indicating that soil temperature rather than N immobilization is the main contributor to decreased yields at higher residue levels. Differences in early season soil NO 3 –N production and a similar difference in mean corn N requirement at the 0× and 1× residue levels, suggest that applying about 30 kg ha−1 of extra N will provide yield benefits in some years in no‐till corn residue systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andraski et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: