Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study investigated whether the loss of spinal mu-opioid receptors following peripheral nerve injury is related to mechanical allodynia. We compared the quantity of spinal mu-opioid receptor and the effect of its antagonists, such as naloxone and CTOP, on pain behaviors in two groups of rats that showed extremely different severity of mechanical allodynia 2 weeks following partial injury of tail-innervating nerves. One group (allodynic group) exhibited robust signs of mechanical allodynia after the nerve injury, whereas the other group (non-allodynic group) showed little allodynia despite having suffered the same nerve injury. In addition, we investigated the quantity of spinal mu-opioid receptor and the effect of its antagonists on pain behaviors after the rats had recovered from mechanical allodynia 16 weeks following nerve injury. Immunohistochemical and Western blot analyses at 2 weeks after nerve injury indicated that spinal mu-opioid receptor content was more reduced in the allodynic group compared to the non-allodynic group. Intraperitoneal naloxone (2 mg/kg, i.p.) and intrathecal CTOP (10 microg/rat, i.t.) administration dramatically induced mechanical allodynia in the non-allodynic group. However, as in naïve animals, neither the loss of spinal mu-opioid receptors nor antagonist-induced mechanical allodynia was observed in the rats that had recovered from mechanical allodynia. These results suggest that the loss of spinal mu-opioid receptors following peripheral nerve injury is related to mechanical allodynia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Back et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: