Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short communication demonstrates farmgate phosphorus balance impact on river and lake water quality in Northern Ireland, highlighting P reduction pathways.
This short communication proposes a pathway for achieving river and lake water quality phosphorus (P) targets using the agricultural farmgate P balance (FPB). The context is the internationally important Lough Neagh and general river network in Northern Ireland (NI). A meta-analysis shows a direct and strong linear relationship between the FPB and, with a one-year lag, the mean soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentration for ninety-three river sites over eighteen years (R 2 = 0.73, p < 0.01) during quiescent conditions. The model suggests that a reduction of the national FPB to 5.5 kg ha −1 yr −1 will improve up to 100% of river SRP mean annual concentrations to at least the moderate/good boundary target for SRP status, and 25% to the good/high status. In Lough Neagh, the moderate/good boundary is an in-lake mean annual total P (TP) concentration target of 0.044 mg L −1 . The annual TP load normalised to a flow weighted mean concentration (FWMC) required to achieve this target in the eight major Lough Neagh rivers is 0.109 mg L −1 . Applying a five-year time lag to the TP FWMC data when compared to the FPB also indicates 5.5 kg ha −1 yr −1 as a way to reach this in-lake target (R 2 = 0.72, p < 0.01). Allowing for non-FPB sources being part of P mitigation strategies would either speed up the process of P reductions in rivers and to lakes, or relieve the burden to the agricultural sector if a FPB was increased proportionally to an optimum target. • Farmgate P balance (FPB) linked to river and lake P mitigation targets. • 1 yr river time lag between FPB and quiescent mean SRP concentration. • 5 yr river time lag between FPB and flow weighted mean TP concentration. • FPB of 5.5 kg ha −1 yr −1 ideal; optimised to 6.9 kg ha −1 yr −1 with non-FPB sources. • High FPB linked to gross agricultural output requires knowledge exchange focus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jordan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: