Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable origin authentication is needed for wild-simulated ginseng (WSG; Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) because lower-priced imported products may be mislabeled as domestically produced Korean WSG. This study evaluated whether image-derived root morphology can provide an objective framework for distinguishing Korean WSG from Chinese-origin ginseng samples. A total of 248 specimens (176 Korean and 72 Chinese-origin samples) were imaged, segmented into root crown and whole-root regions, and quantified using 41 morphological traits, comprising 12 crown traits and 29 whole-root traits. Trait differences and discriminative patterns were assessed using FDR-controlled statistical testing, multivariate analysis, and classification modeling. After FDR correction, 35 of 41 traits remained robustly different between origins, including 9 of 12 crown traits and 26 of 29 whole-root traits. Chinese-origin samples generally showed larger size- and thickness-related values, particularly for area, perimeter, diameter, surface area, and volume. The FDR-selected traits supported origin-associated multivariate separation and high classification performance, with accuracy ranging from 98.8–99.6%. These findings indicate that quantitative root phenotyping can support non-destructive origin-group screening of ginseng and provide a practical basis for automated authentication and quality-control systems, although external validation across broader cultivation and environmental conditions remains necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: