Why the study?
Cardiomyocyte cultures enable high-throughput antiarrhythmic screening, but comparative electrophysiological data across commonly used preparations are lacking.
NRVMs and hiPSC-CMs demonstrate superior electrophysiological responsiveness compared to HL-1 cells, providing important comparative data to inform model selection for high-throughput antiarrhythmic drug screening.
Guides cardiomyocyte model selection for arrhythmia screening; leaves open clinical translation of findings.
Cardiac arrhythmias of both atrial and ventricular origin are an important feature of cardiovascular disease. Novel antiarrhythmic therapies are required to overcome current drug limitations related to effectiveness and pro-arrhythmia risk in some contexts. Cardiomyocyte culture models provide a high-throughput platform for screening antiarrhythmic compounds, but comparative information about electrophysiological properties of commonly used types of cardiomyocyte preparations is lacking. Standardization of cultured cardiomyocyte microelectrode array (MEA) experimentation is required for its application as a high-throughput platform for antiarrhythmic drug development. The aim of this study was to directly compare the electrophysiological properties and responses to isoproterenol of three commonly used cardiac cultures. Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs), immortalized atrial HL-1 cells, and custom-generated human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) were cultured on microelectrode arrays for 48-120 h. Extracellular field potentials were recorded, and conduction velocity was mapped in the presence/absence of the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol (1 µM). Field potential amplitude and conduction velocity were greatest in NRVMs and did not differ in cardiomyocytes isolated from male/female hearts. Both NRVMs and hiPSC-CMs exhibited longer field potential durations with rate dependence and were responsive to isoproterenol. In contrast, HL-1 cells exhibited slower conduction and shorter field potential durations and did not respond to 1 µM isoproterenol. This is the first study to compare the intrinsic electrophysiologic properties of cultured cardiomyocyte preparations commonly used for in vitro electrophysiology assessment. These findings offer important comparative data to inform methodological approaches in the use of MEA and other techniques relating to cardiomyocyte functional screening investigations of particular relevance to arrhythmogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wells et al. (2019) studied Cardiac arrhythmias. Isoproterenol vs. absence of isoproterenol was evaluated on Extracellular field potentials and conduction velocity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: