Experimental study explores bis(phosphine) ligand reactivity in dicobalt carbonyl complexes, suggesting diverse mechanism outcomes.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide A series of bis(phosphine) cobalt carbonyl complexes were prepared and investigated in situ using cyclic voltammetry, 1 H, 31 P, and 59 Co NMR spectroscopy (including DOSY), and IR spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction analysis on isolated single crystals confirmed that complex speciation was highly dependent on the nature of the bis(phosphine) and ligand-to-metal stoichiometry. Reactions of [Co 2 (CO) 8 ] with 1,2-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ethane (DCyPE) and 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene (DPPBz) led to disproportionation of the precursor, affording cationic κ 2 -Co(I) bis(phosphine) complexes with Co(−I) tetracarbonyl cobaltate counteranions. In contrast, ferrocenyl bis(phosphine) ligands 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (DPPF), 1,1′-bis(di-isopropylphosphino)ferrocene (D i PrPF), and 1,1′-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ferrocene (DCyPF), displayed different reactivity. D i PrPF and DCyPF appeared to form polymeric species at 1:1 ligand-to-metal ratios but favored the formation of discrete neutral dinuclear complexes of the type [(μ 2 -L)Co 2 (CO) 6 ] when 0.5 equiv of ligand was employed. Reaction of [Co 2 (CO) 8 ] with DPPF yielded a significantly larger molecular assembly. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed an unprecedented metallocyclic structure comprising six cobalt tricarbonyl centers interconnected by four bridging DPPF ligands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bailey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: