Investigates hydrogen yield in renewable syngas, suggesting efficiency improvements through process adjustments.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Producing renewable hydrogen from biomass is essential for the transition to low-carbon energy systems and sustainable fuel production. Biomass-derived syngas streams from biorefineries are a promising hydrogen source, but their compositional variability and high fractions of CO 2 and H 2 significantly affect hydrogen production performance. Sorption-enhanced steam reforming (SESR) combines steam reforming with in situ CO 2 capture using CaO-based sorbents, enhancing hydrogen production through process intensification. This work investigates autothermal SESR enabled by CO 2 -rich feed compositions and heat integration to improve energy efficiency. An Aspen Plus equilibrium model was used to evaluate the effects of syngas composition and operating conditions (steam-to-carbon = 2.5–6.5, CaO/C = 1.5–2.5) on hydrogen production and energy performance at 600 °C and 10 bar. CO-rich feeds improve H 2 purity, CH 4 conversion, CO 2 capture efficiency, and cold gas efficiency (CGE) by promoting the water–gas shift reaction and methane reforming through reduced CO 2 partial pressure. In contrast, CH 4 - and H 2 -rich feeds decrease H 2 purity and methane conversion due to lower effective steam-to-methane ratios and equilibrium limitations. However, these compositions improve overall energy efficiency by reducing the external fuel required for sorbent regeneration. Increasing steam availability enhances performance up to a threshold beyond which Ca(OH) 2 formation becomes significant, which strongly penalizes efficiency due to additional regeneration energy demand. Under optimal conditions, hydrogen purities up to 99.2 vol %, CO 2 capture efficiency of 98.8%, and a CGE of 81% are achieved. These results help define operating windows for autothermal SESR and support the design of flexible and energy-efficient hydrogen production systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vega et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: