Examines the impact of green bonds, CDS, and geopolitical risk on CO2 emissions in China, suggesting policy options for decarbonization.
Countries have been dealing with environmental issues and searching for solutions. By considering China's leading position among the highest carbon dioxide (CO 2 )-emitting countries, as well as the lack of sectoral examination, this study uncovers the interrelationships among green bonds (GBs), credit default swap (CDS) spreads, geopolitical risk (GPR), and CO 2 emissions in China. In doing this, the study considers main sectors (i.e., transport, industry, and power) and total CO 2 emissions to consider sectoral heterogeneity, uses monthly data from 2019/1 to 2026/2, and applies the Wavelet Local Multiple Correlation (WLMC) method. The study empirically reveals that (i) in bi-variate analysis, GB, CDS, and GPR have mixed association with sectoral CO 2 emissions across terms; (ii) in multivariate analysis, GB, CDS, and GPR have a positive association with sectoral and total CO 2 emissions; (iii) at the sectoral level, GPR and CDS have a negative association with power sector and total CO 2 emissions across short-term and medium-term. Also, GB has a mixed association with sectoral and total CO 2 emissions across the medium-term; (iv) the dominant variable varies across sectors and terms, where CDS and GB are leading at short-term and long-term, while CDS and GPR are pioneering in medium-term; (v) the outcomes, where dominance of effective factors is searched, do not differ across aggregated and disaggregated level CO 2 emissions. Thus, empirical outcomes highlight the differentiating association of the factors with sectoral and total CO 2 emissions, whereas the dominance of the factors is stable across sectoral and total CO 2 emissions. Accordingly, relying on the empirical findings, the study discusses various policy options for Chinese policymakers in decarbonizing economic sectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kartal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: