Key result
Lower limb passive stretching lowers systolic blood pressure by ~6 mmHg in essential hypertension.
Why the study?
Passive stretching was shown to lower blood pressure and arterial stiffness in healthy individuals, but whether similar effects occur in essential hypertension was unknown.
Does a 6-week passive stretching intervention of the lower limbs reduce blood pressure and improve vascular responsiveness in patients with essential hypertension?
Does a 6-week passive stretching intervention of the lower limbs reduce blood pressure and improve vascular responsiveness in patients with essential hypertension?
Standardized Mean Difference: -0.99
p-value: p=<0.001
A 6-week lower limb passive stretching protocol significantly reduces blood pressure and improves local vascular responsiveness in patients with essential hypertension, though these benefits dissipate after discontinuation.
May lower BP short-term in essential hypertension; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Purpose Previous studies on healthy subjects suggest that 6-week passive stretching (PS) lowers blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness by enhancing vascular responsiveness in both stretched and non-stretched arteries. This study investigated whether a similar 6-week PS intervention applied to the lower limbs could elicit similar effects in patients with essential hypertension. Methods 24 patients underwent assessments of central arterial stiffness (carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity, PWV cf ), brachial (systemic) and femoral (local) vascular responsiveness (flow-mediated dilation, FMD; nitrate-mediated dilation, NMD; and single passive limb movement, sPLM), as well as BP and heart rate recordings. Measurements were obtained at baseline, after a 6-week control period, and following PS and a follow-up of the same duration. Results No changes occurred following the 6-week control period. After PS, systolic, diastolic, and mean BP decreased by 4.9(SD4.6)% ( P < 0.001, ES = –0.99), 6.9(SD4.9)% ( P < 0.001, ES = –1.43), and 3.7(SD6.2)% ( P = 0.005, ES = –0.63), respectively. Peak Q̇ fem increased by 18.4(SD19.0)% ( P < 0.001, ES = 0.92), and Δ Q̇ fem by 27.1(SD21.7)% ( P < 0.001, ES = 0.98). PWV cf , FMD, NMD, and heart rate remained unchanged. No correlations were retrieved between percentage differences in Q̇ fem and BP variables. Furthermore, all improvements returned to baseline during follow-up. Conclusion These findings indicate that 6-week PS effectively reduces blood pressure in hypertensive patients, possibly due to improved vascular responsiveness in the stretched arteries and the combined effect of other mechanisms that cannot be identified individually. However, these benefits dissipate once the intervention is discontinued.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toninelli et al. (2026) studied Essential hypertension (n=24). Passive stretching of lower limbs vs. 6-week control period was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (ES -0.99, p=<0.001). A 6-week lower limb passive stretching intervention significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 6.3 mmHg (4.9%) in patients with essential hypertension, though benefits dissipated after discontinuation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: