Technical monograph examines gravitational dynamics emerging from quantum informational processes, indicating novel insights into geometry.
This technical monograph develops a modular research programme for Quantum Informational Geometrodynamics (QI-G), investigating whether gravitational geometry and dynamics can emerge from coherent quantum-information processes without assuming spacetime geometry as a fundamental background. The collected work develops quantum-channel connections and causal holonomy, conditional continuum limits, spatial soldering and triad reconstruction, coherent derivations of the DeWitt kinetic form, Regge and holonomy curvature sectors, ADM-type effective phases, discrete constraint-algebra benchmarks, shape matching, perfect-process coarse graining, gauge-preserving tensor-network truncations, non-Abelian SU(2) heat-kernel gluing, Racah/intertwiner mixing, and representation-fusion gap tests. The central conclusion is a conditional compatibility and non-selection result. Within the explicit process architectures studied, the ADM/General Relativity structure can be reconstructed and structurally protected, including the DeWitt ratio, a common kinetic-curvature coupling, and gauge-measure cancellation under stated assumptions. However, generic renormalization-group attraction to General Relativity is not established: residual intertwiner-superselection directions remain marginal unless an additional non-central, representation-changing microscopic vertex dynamics is supplied. The deposit contains exact algebraic identities, conditional theorems, constructed mathematical benchmarks, synthetic numerical experiments, source files, and an explicit statement of claims and limitations. It is a technical research monograph and preprint record. It has not undergone independent peer review and does not claim a complete theory of quantum gravity, empirical validation, or a derivation of General Relativity from the original QI-G postulates without additional assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Gutierrez Ule (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: