Systematic literature review documents content moderation impacts on expression in Southeast Asia, revealing key study findings.
This collection supports the systematic literature review “Platform Content Moderation and Freedom of Expression in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Literature Review”. It includes: (1) search documentation and the aggregate study-selection record; (2) a completed PRISMA 2020 checklist; (3) a study-level matrix for the final 35 included studies; and (4) the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. The documented selection flow comprises 3,886 records identified, 67 duplicates removed, 3,819 records screened, 3,706 records excluded, 113 full-text reports assessed for eligibility, 78 full-text reports excluded, and 35 studies included. The collection does not include full-text journal articles. The available documentation does not preserve exact execution dates, database-specific retrieval totals, or reason-specific counts for full-text exclusions. These values have not been inferred or reconstructed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puspita et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: