Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates trust mediation of environmental effects on human-robot collaboration efficiency in construction, indicating key insights for intelligent building.
Human–robot collaborative performance is influenced by physical workplace conditions, which can affect performance indirectly through workers' physiological comfort, cognitive load, and situational awareness. Under summer high-temperature conditions, construction sites impose increased environmental constraints on collaboration. This paper investigates how adverse summer working environments influence human–robot collaboration efficiency, and whether workers' trust in robots mediates this relationship. A pilot experiment was conducted using a representative rebar-tying task to compare human–robot collaboration in two construction environments: a relatively comfortable, factory-like environment enabled by an aerial building machine (ABM) and a conventional non-ABM environment characterized by more adverse working conditions. Results show that the ABM environment improves collaborative efficiency by approximately 19.8% and enhances trust. Trust also significantly mediates the effect of environment on performance. These findings offer insights into human–robot collaboration and guide intelligent construction under high-temperature conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: