Key result
Ultrasound guidance for CIED implantation trends toward fewer complications versus traditional techniques.
Why the study?
Ultrasound guidance for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation is currently not routine practice.
Does ultrasound guidance reduce complication rates in patients undergoing implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Does ultrasound guidance reduce complication rates in patients undergoing implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Ultrasound guidance for CIED implantation appears feasible and may reduce complications, though more high-quality randomized trials are needed to establish it as routine practice.
US guidance for CIED implantation has mostly observational data; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
Ultrasound (US) guidance for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is currently not routine practice. This article sought to review published data on the use of ultrasound in each of the major surgical steps involved in implantation of CIEDs, including achieving anesthesia, obtaining venous access and implantation of leads. A literature review was performed, revealing a total of 20 peer-reviewed studies that assessed US guidance for CIED implantation; 3 of these were randomized trials while the remainder were mostly feasibility studies. The available data suggest that ultrasound can be useful in guiding implantation of CIEDs, with a trend towards less complication rates; however, more high-quality studies that compare US guidance to traditional techniques in CIED implantation are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mian et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Ultrasound guidance vs. Traditional techniques (fluoroscopy, blind cannulation, cephalic cutdown) was evaluated. Ultrasound guidance can be useful in guiding implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices, with a trend towards lower complication rates compared to traditional techniques.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: