Key result
Analysis of over 400 real foetal heart rate signals demonstrated the need to standardize FHRV evaluation procedures and consider week of gestation and foetal state before analysis.
Standardization of foetal heart rate variability evaluation is necessary, and week of gestation and foetal state must be considered before analysis.
FHRV evaluation requires standardization adjusted for gestational week and fetal state; leaves open validation against clinical outcomes.
Monitoring of foetal heart rate and its variability (FHRV) covers an important role in assessing health of foetus. Many analysis methods have been used to get quantitative measures of FHRV. FHRV has been studied in time and in frequency domain and interesting clinical results have been obtained. Nevertheless, a standardized definition of FHRV and a precise methodology to be used for its evaluation are lacking. We carried out a literature overview about both frequency domain analysis (FDA) and time domain analysis (TDA). Then, by using simulated FHR signals, we defined the methodology for FDA. Further, employing more than 400 real FHR signals, we analysed some of the most common indexes, Short Term Variability for TDA and power content of the spectrum bands and sympathovagal balance for FDA, and evaluated their ranges of values, which in many cases are a novelty. Finally, we verified the relationship between these indexes and two important parameters: week of gestation, indicator of foetal growth, and foetal state, classified as active or at rest. Our results indicate that, according to literature, it is necessary to standardize the procedure for FHRV evaluation and to consider week of gestation and foetal state before FHR analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romano et al. (2016) conducted a review in Foetal heart rate variability (n=400). Foetal heart rate variability (FHRV) indexes was evaluated on Ranges of values for FHRV indexes and their relationship with week of gestation and foetal state. Analysis of over 400 real foetal heart rate signals demonstrated the need to standardize FHRV evaluation procedures and consider week of gestation and foetal state before analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: