Key result
The apparent left main FFR in the presence of downstream stenosis was significantly higher than the true FFR without downstream stenosis (0.80 vs 0.76; mean difference 0.035; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the presence of downstream epicardial stenosis affect the fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment of left main coronary stenosis?
Does the presence of downstream epicardial stenosis affect the fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment of left main coronary stenosis?
Downstream epicardial stenosis only has a clinically relevant effect on FFR assessment of left main disease when the downstream stenosis is proximal and very severe.
May bias left main FFR upward with severe downstream lesions; hypothesis-generating in animals, needs human validation.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement can aid in the assessment of left main coronary stenosis. However, the impact of downstream epicardial stenosis on left main FFR assessment with the pressure wire in the nonstenosed downstream vessel remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Variable stenoses were created in the left main coronary arteries and downstream epicardial vessels in 6 anaesthetized male sheep using balloon catheters. A total of 220 pairs of FFR assessments of the left main stenosis were obtained, before and after creation of a stenosis in a downstream epicardial vessel, by having a pressure-sensor wire in the other nonstenosed downstream vessel. The apparent left main FFR in the presence of downstream stenosis (FFR(app)) was significantly higher compared with the true FFR in the absence of downstream stenosis (FFR(true); 0.80±0.05 versus 0.76±0.05; estimate of the mean difference, 0.035; P<0.001). The difference between FFR(true) and FFR(app) correlated with composite FFR of the left main plus stenosed artery (r=-0.31; P<0.001) indicating that this difference was greater with increasing epicardial stenosis severity. Among measurements with FFR(app) >0.80, 9% were associated with an FFR(true) of <0.75. In all instances, the epicardial lesion was in the proximal portion of the stenosed vessel, and the epicardial FFR (combined FFR of the left main and downstream stenosed vessel) was ≤0.50. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically relevant effect on the FFR assessment of left main disease with the pressure wire in a nonstenosed downstream vessel occurs only when the stenosis in the other vessel is proximal and very severe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yong et al. (2013) studied Left main coronary stenosis (n=6). Creation of downstream epicardial stenosis vs. Absence of downstream stenosis was evaluated on Fractional flow reserve (FFR) of the left main stenosis (mean difference 0.035, p=<0.001). The apparent left main FFR in the presence of downstream stenosis was significantly higher than the true FFR without downstream stenosis (0.80 vs 0.76; mean difference 0.035; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: