Key result
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment is superior to other invasive morphological studies for evaluating coronary artery stenosis, with revascularization recommended for FFR <0.80.
Why the study?
Does fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment guide appropriate myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary artery stenosis?
Does fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment guide appropriate myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary artery stenosis?
FFR is the superior invasive method for physiological testing of coronary lesions to determine the need for revascularization compared to morphological studies.
May support FFR-guided revascularization decisions; leaves open prospective validation against newer indices.
Objective proof of focal lesions is mandatory, and the best invasive method of physiological testing is fractional flow r eserve (FFR). The increased trans-stenotic gradient is measured via the guiding catheter and pressure transducer on a 0.014" coronary wire at maximal hyperaemia induced by adenosine. Patients with a FFR of less than 0.8 should undergo myocardial revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, particularly if the proximal and middle segments of the main coronary arteries and large side-branches are affected; there is no prognostic revascularisation benefit in patients with moderate stenoses and FFR greater than 0.80. FFR assessment of coronary lesions is superior to other invasive morphological studies, such as intracoronary ultrasound or optical coherence tomography. Its use in non-culprit vessels in acute coronary syndromes is currently under scrutiny. Recent advances in computed tomographic technique allow non-invasive assessment of FFR, but clinical validation has yet to be obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Șerban Bălănescu (2016) conducted a review in Coronary Artery Stenosis. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) assessment vs. Intracoronary ultrasound or optical coherence tomography was evaluated. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment is superior to other invasive morphological studies for evaluating coronary artery stenosis, with revascularization recommended for FFR <0.80.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: