Key result
FFR remains the gold standard with a Class IA recommendation for guiding multivessel PCI.
Why the study?
Assessing reversible ischaemia is paramount when selecting coronary stenoses for interventional treatment, and FFR was recently upgraded to a class IA recommendation in multivessel PCI.
Does routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) improve patient outcomes in selecting coronary stenoses for interventional treatment?
Does routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) improve patient outcomes in selecting coronary stenoses for interventional treatment?
This review highlights the rationale and evidence supporting the routine integration of FFR into everyday practice for selecting coronary lesions for stenting.
FFR-guided lesion selection may improve elective PCI outcomes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of prognostic benefit.
When selecting coronary stenoses for interventional treatment, assessment of reversible ischaemia is paramount from a symptomatic as well as prognostic point of view. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is now considered the gold standard for invasive assessment of ischaemia. By measuring FFR in the catheterization laboratory, one can accurately identify which lesions should be stented resulting in improved patient outcome in most elective clinical and angiographic conditions. Recently, in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on coronary revascularization, FFR was upgraded to an IA classification in multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. In this review paper, the rationale for routine measurement of FFR will be reviewed and studies supporting its integration into everyday practice will be highlighted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pijls et al. (2012) conducted a review in Coronary stenoses. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was evaluated. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for invasive assessment of ischaemia and is recommended as an IA classification in multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: