Retrospective study assesses treatment outcomes based on imaging classification in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy, suggesting early intervention benefits.
Objectives: To assess the association between clinical outcomes and the multimodal imaging-based classification of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Methods: This retrospective study included 207 eyes from 155 treatment-naïve patients with CSC. The eyes were categorized into two groups, including the simple CSC group (n = 164) and the complex CSC group (n = 43), based on the presence of retinal pigment epithelial atrophy spanning two or more disc areas. All patients were initially observed without treatment for 3–6 months. For cases with persistent subretinal fluid after this observation period, treatment modalities, including continued observation, photocoagulation (PC), or photodynamic therapy (PDT), were selected. Results: Patients in the complex CSC group were more likely to be older (p = 0.01) and male (p = 0.01) than those in the simple group and to exhibit a higher prevalence of bilateral involvement (p < 0.001) and previous CSC episodes (p < 0.001) than those exhibited by patients in the simple group. Eyes with complex CSC exhibited a comparable incidence of spontaneous resolution within 6 months and a higher incidence of recurrence after spontaneous resolution within 6 months than eyes with simple CSC. In both the simple and complex CSC groups, the PDT subgroup exhibited a lower recurrence rate than that of the PC subgroup (simple CSC: p < 0.001, complex CSC: p = 0.03). Conclusions: Although CSC is typically a self-limiting disease often managed conservatively, patients with complex CSC, characterized by bilateral involvement or a history of previous episodes, are at a higher risk of subretinal fluid recurrence and may benefit from early interventions without a period of observation, such as PDT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: