Key result
Expert subjects exhibited significantly decreased total number of movements, instrument path length, and total time to complete tasks compared to Novices during phantom tissue anastomosis.
Why the study?
Does hand-motion-tracking analysis using a motion sensing system differentiate surgical skill proficiency between novices and experts?
Cross-Sectional (n=11)
Does hand-motion-tracking analysis using a motion sensing system differentiate surgical skill proficiency between novices and experts?
Hand-motion tracking using a sensor mounted on a needle driver can objectively differentiate surgical skill levels based on movement patterns and time.
Motion tracking differentiates expertise levels; leaves open its role in training assessment or certification.
With changes in work hour limitations, there is an increasing need for objective determination of technical proficiency. Electromagnetic hand-motion analysis has previously shown only time to completion and number of movements to correlation with expertise. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of hand-motion-tracking analysis in determining surgical skill proficiency. A nine-degree-of-freedom sensor was used and mounted on the superior aspect of a needle driver. A one-way analysis of variance and Welch's t test were performed to evaluate significance between subjects. Four Novices, four Trainees, and three Experts performed a large vessel patch anastomosis on a phantom tissue. Path length, total number of movements, absolute velocity, and total time were analyzed between groups. Compared to the Novices, Expert subjects exhibited significantly decreased total number of movements, decreased instrument path length, and decreased total time to complete tasks. There were no significant differences found in absolute velocity between groups. In this pilot study, we have identified significant differences in patterns of motion between Novice and Expert subjects. These data warrant further analysis for its predictive value in larger cohorts at different levels of training and may be a useful tool in competence-based training paradigms in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Genovese et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgical skill proficiency (n=11). Expertise level (Expert vs Novice) vs. Novices was evaluated on Path length, total number of movements, absolute velocity, and total time. Expert subjects exhibited significantly decreased total number of movements, instrument path length, and total time to complete tasks compared to Novices during phantom tissue anastomosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: