Key result
Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation increased mean maximal workload by 28.7 W (95% CI 21.8-35.6) and systolic blood pressure by 25.4 mm Hg in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair.
Why the study?
More knowledge was needed regarding the risks and benefits of exercise in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair.
Does outpatient cardiac rehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness and blood pressure in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair?
Meta-Analysis (n=241)
Does outpatient cardiac rehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness and blood pressure in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair?
Mean Difference: 28.7 (95% CI 21.8–35.6)
Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appears safe and effectively improves exercise tolerance and maximal workload in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair.
Supports outpatient cardiac rehabilitation after thoracic aortic repair; extends evidence to this population.
PURPOSE: It is of clinical importance to gain more knowledge about the risks and benefits of exercise in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair. Therefore, the aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, and the incidence of adverse events during cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair. REVIEW METHODS: We performed a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of outcomes before versus after outpatient CR in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO CRD42022301204) and published. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were systematically searched for eligible studies. Overall certainty of evidence was scored with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). SUMMARY: We included five studies with data from in total 241 patients. Data from one study could not be used in our meta-analysis because they were provided in a different unit of measure. Four studies with data of 146 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean maximal workload increased with 28.7 W (95% CI: 21.8-35.6 W, n = 146, low certainty of evidence). The mean systolic blood pressure during exercise testing increased with 25.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.6-34.3, n = 133, low certainty of evidence). No exercise-induced adverse events were reported. These outcomes indicate that CR seems beneficial and safe to improve exercise tolerance in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair, although outcomes were based on data from a small, heterogeneous group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koenders et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in recovering from thoracic aortic repair (n=241). Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation vs. Before cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Mean maximal workload (MD 28.7, 95% CI 21.8-35.6). Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation increased mean maximal workload by 28.7 W (95% CI 21.8-35.6) and systolic blood pressure by 25.4 mm Hg in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: