Key result
The Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills tool demonstrated overall reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.88) and construct validity (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Is the Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills (RAPS) tool valid, reliable, and feasible for assessing trainees?
Is the Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills (RAPS) tool valid, reliable, and feasible for assessing trainees?
The Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills tool is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing trainee performance in regional anesthesia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support regional anesthesia training assessment; leaves open need for prospective validation before adoption.
The aim of this study was to create and evaluate the validity, reliability and feasibility of the Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills tool, designed for the assessment of all peripheral and neuraxial blocks using all nerve localisation techniques. The first phase was construction of a 25-item checklist by five regional anaesthesia experts using a Delphi process. This checklist was combined with a global rating scale to create the tool. In the second phase, initial validation by 10 independent anaesthetists using a test-retest methodology was successful (Cohen kappa ≥ 0.70 for inter-rater agreement, scores between test to retest, paired t-test, p > 0.12). In the third phase, 70 clinical videos of trainees were scored by three blinded international assessors. The RAPS tool exhibited face validity (p < 0.026), construct validity (p < 0.001), feasibility (mean time to score < 3.9 min), and overall reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.88)). The Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills tool used in this study is a valid and reliable assessment tool to score the performance of trainees for regional anaesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chuan et al. (2015) studied Regional anaesthesia training (n=70). Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills (RAPS) tool was evaluated on Validity, reliability and feasibility of the RAPS tool (Intraclass correlation coefficient 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.88, p=<0.001). The Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills tool demonstrated overall reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.88) and construct validity (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: