Key result
An automated natural language processing algorithm accurately abstracted stress echocardiography reports, achieving 95.7% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity for overall results classification.
Why the study?
Stress echocardiography findings are commonly documented in free-text reports requiring laborious manual reviews, creating a need for an automated method to abstract reports in large cohorts.
Can an automated natural language processing algorithm accurately abstract and classify unstructured stress echocardiography reports compared to manual cardiologist review?
Observational (n=6,346)
Double-blind
Can an automated natural language processing algorithm accurately abstract and classify unstructured stress echocardiography reports compared to manual cardiologist review?
Effect estimate: 95.7% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity
An automated natural language processing algorithm can accurately and efficiently abstract unstructured stress echocardiography reports, facilitating large-scale research and quality improvement.
May aid scalable research and quality initiatives using stress echo data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical workflows.
Aims Stress echocardiography (SE) findings and interpretations are commonly documented in free-text reports. Reusing SE results requires laborious manual reviews. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated method for abstracting SE reports in a large cohort. Methods and results This study included adult patients who had SE within 30 days of their emergency department visit for suspected acute coronary syndrome in a large integrated healthcare system. An automated natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was developed to abstract SE reports and classify overall SE results into normal, non-diagnostic, infarction, and ischaemia categories. Randomly selected reports (n = 140) were double-blindly reviewed by cardiologists to perform criterion validity of the NLP algorithm. Construct validity was tested on the entire cohort using abstracted SE data and additional clinical variables. The NLP algorithm abstracted 6346 consecutive SE reports. Cardiologists had good agreements on the overall SE results on the 140 reports: Kappa (0.83) and intraclass correlation coefficient (0.89). The NLP algorithm achieved 98.6% specificity and negative predictive value, 95.7% sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F-score on the overall SE results and near-perfect scores on ischaemia findings. The 30-day acute myocardial infarction or death outcomes were highest among patients with ischaemia (5.0%), followed by infarction (1.4%), non-diagnostic (0.8%), and normal (0.3%) results. We found substantial variations in the format and quality of SE reports, even within the same institution. Conclusions Natural language processing is an accurate and efficient method for abstracting unstructured SE reports. This approach creates new opportunities for research, public health measures, and care improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=6,346). Automated natural language processing (NLP) algorithm vs. Manual review by cardiologists was evaluated on Overall stress echocardiography results classification (normal, non-diagnostic, infarction, and ischaemia) (95.7% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity). An automated natural language processing algorithm accurately abstracted stress echocardiography reports, achieving 95.7% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity for overall results classification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: