Key result
In children and adolescents with incidental dual AV nodal physiology after successful accessory pathway ablation, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia occurred in 13.6% over a mean 3.1 years.
Why the study?
Does incidental dual AV nodal physiology predict the development of AVNRT in children and adolescents after successful accessory pathway ablation?
Cohort (n=66)
No
Does incidental dual AV nodal physiology predict the development of AVNRT in children and adolescents after successful accessory pathway ablation?
Incidental dual AV nodal physiology after successful accessory pathway ablation does not strongly predict the development of AVNRT in children and adolescents.
Observation suffices after incidental dual AV nodal physiology in pediatric accessory pathway ablation; leaves open refined AVNRT risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology is a substrate for the development of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the risk of developing AVNRT in patients with dual AV nodal physiology is not known. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk of developing AVNRT in children and adolescents with incidental findings of dual AV nodal physiology after accessory pathway ablation. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective study of patients who underwent intracardiac electrophysiology study at The Children's Hospital, Denver, from March 1993 to August 2008, with findings of dual AV nodal physiology after successful ablation of an accessory pathway. Follow-up was obtained by chart review with the primary outcome of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia. Extended clinical follow-up was also achieved through phone contact with patients or parents of patients. RESULTS: Mean age at initial electrophysiology study was 12.8 years (±3.7 years). Follow-up was obtained on all 66 patients for a mean duration of 3.1 years (±2.8 years). Mean age at follow-up was 15.8 years (±4.6 years). Recurrent supraventricular tachycardia occurred in nine of the 66 patients (13.6%). AVNRT was induced in two of the 66 patients (3.0%). CONCLUSION: This study supports the hypothesis that incidental dual AV nodal physiology does not predict AVNRT in children and adolescents with after successful accessory pathway ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCanta et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Incidental dual AV nodal physiology after accessory pathway ablation (n=66). Incidental dual AV nodal physiology was evaluated on recurrent supraventricular tachycardia. In children and adolescents with incidental dual AV nodal physiology after successful accessory pathway ablation, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia occurred in 13.6% over a mean 3.1 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: