Key result
A multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic for high-risk surgical patients reduced unplanned ICU admissions (8% vs 19%) and 30-day mortality (0% vs 13%) compared to a historical cohort.
Why the study?
This audit assessed the impact of introducing a multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic on postoperative outcomes and resource usage amongst high-risk surgical patients.
Does a multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic improve postoperative outcomes and resource usage in high-risk surgical patients?
Cohort (n=46)
No
Does a multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic improve postoperative outcomes and resource usage in high-risk surgical patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 19%
A multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic for high-risk surgical patients may improve postoperative outcomes and reduce resource utilization, partly through more appropriate patient selection.
Clinic evaluation may improve outcomes in high-risk surgery; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Various perioperative interventions have been demonstrated to improve outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing surgery. This audit assessed the impact of introducing a multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic on postoperative outcomes and resource usage amongst high-risk patients. Between January 2019 and March 2020, our institution piloted a Comprehensive High-Risk Surgical Patient Clinic. Surgical patients were eligible for referral when exhibiting criteria known to increase perioperative risk. The patient’s decision whether to proceed with surgery was recorded; for those proceeding with surgery, perioperative outcomes and bed occupancy were recorded and compared against a similar surgical population identified as high-risk at our institution in 2017. Of 23 Comprehensive High-Risk Surgical Patient Clinic referrals, 11 did not proceed with the original planned surgery. Comprehensive High-Risk Surgical patients undergoing original planned surgery, as compared to high-risk patients from 2017, experienced reduced unplanned intensive care unit admission (8% versus 19%, respectively), 30-day mortality (0% versus 13%) and 30-day re-admission to hospital (0% versus 20%); had shorter postoperative lengths of stay (median (range) 8 (7–14) days versus 10.5 (5–28)) and spent more days alive outside of hospital at 30 days (median (range) 18 (0–25) versus 21 (16–23)). Cumulatively, the Comprehensive High-Risk Surgical patient cohort compared to the 2017 cohort (both n=23) occupied fewer postoperative intensive care (total 13 versus 24) and hospital bed-days (total 106 versus 212). The results of our Comprehensive High-Risk Surgical Patient pilot project audit suggest improved individual outcomes for high-risk patients proceeding with surgery. In addition, the results support potential resource savings through more appropriate patient selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fullbrook et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in High-risk surgical patients (n=46). Comprehensive High-Risk Surgical Patient Clinic vs. Historical high-risk surgical cohort from 2017 was evaluated on Unplanned intensive care unit admission. A multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic for high-risk surgical patients reduced unplanned ICU admissions (8% vs 19%) and 30-day mortality (0% vs 13%) compared to a historical cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: