Key result
A higher proportion of good quality muscle was associated with a lower prevalence of significant coronary artery calcification in women (highest vs lowest quartile OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.98; P=0.003).
Why the study?
Low muscle mass is associated with cardiovascular diseases, but few studies have evaluated the association between muscle quality and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.
Is higher muscle quality measured by abdominal computed tomography associated with a lower risk of significant coronary artery calcification in subjects without cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,068)
Is higher muscle quality measured by abdominal computed tomography associated with a lower risk of significant coronary artery calcification in subjects without cardiovascular disease?
Odds Ratio: 0.34 (95% CI 0.12–0.98)
p-value: p=0.003
Higher skeletal muscle quality measured by abdominal CT is associated with a lower prevalence of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, particularly in women.
Muscle quality by CT may flag higher CAC risk; hypothesis-generating for prospective studies before any clinical role.
Objective: Low muscle mass was known to be associated with cardiovascular diseases. However, only few studies investigated the association between muscle quality and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Thus, we evaluated whether muscle quality measured by abdominal computed tomography is associated with the risk of coronary artery calcification. Approach and Results: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 4068 subjects without cardiovascular disease who underwent abdominal and coronary computed tomography between 2012 and 2013 during health examinations. The cross-sectional area of the skeletal muscle was measured at the L3 level (total abdominal muscle area) and segmented into normal attenuation muscle area, low attenuation muscle area, and intramuscular adipose tissue. We calculated the normal attenuation muscle area/total abdominal muscle area index, of which a higher value reflected a higher proportion of good quality muscle (normal attenuation muscle area) and a lower proportion of myosteatosis (low attenuation muscle area and intramuscular adipose tissue). In women, as the normal attenuation muscle area/total abdominal muscle area quartiles increased, the odds ratios (95% CIs) for significant coronary artery calcification (>100) consistently decreased (0.44 [0.24–0.80], 0.39 [0.19–0.81], 0.34 [0.12–0.98]; P =0.003) after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors including visceral fat area and insulin resistance. In men, the odds ratios in the Q2 group were significantly lower than those in the Q1, but the association was attenuated in Q3–4 after adjustment. Conclusions: A higher proportion of good quality muscle was strongly associated with a lower prevalence of significant coronary artery calcification after adjustment, especially in women. Poor skeletal muscle quality may be an important risk factor for subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis (n=4,068). Higher proportion of good quality muscle (normal attenuation muscle area/total abdominal muscle area index) vs. Lower proportion of good quality muscle (lower quartiles) was evaluated on Significant coronary artery calcification (>100) (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.98, p=0.003). A higher proportion of good quality muscle was associated with a lower prevalence of significant coronary artery calcification in women (highest vs lowest quartile OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.98; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: